It is common for companies to experience a productivity decline as they grow. We hear it consistently from our clients, regardless of industry, growth, or tenure. They find themselves having to do and spend more, only to get less. Faced with this confusing experience, most leaders see the natural next step as doubling down and working harder when, in fact, that is the worst thing they can do. Through our work with thousands of C-suite leaders, we've found that management and clarity, rather than work and executive leadership, are the key factors driving productivity.

Of course, leadership remains essential. Leadership is about an organization's vision—how well-articulated, meaningful, and animated it is. Leadership creates movements and long-term opportunities and is how a company traverses adversity. Yet the productivity engine of day-to-day work is powered by management, not C-suite leadership.

A significant shift in productivity occurs as companies expand to 150+ employees. Rather than the initial design of the leader of a small organization having relationships with all employees, earning and maintaining trust, executives start to seek leverage through a hierarchy. Executives put managers and managers of managers in place, forcing themselves to take on a different role in the 4D model without realizing it.

Authentic design starts with the future and asking:

“Is this how things are supposed to work? What responsibilities, functions, and capabilities are necessary? What needs to be in place today for the future we're planning to be possible?”

These questions feel conceptual and low-priority in the context of massive workloads. When ignored, things start breaking. As more employees are hired, communication changes. It becomes harder to identify confusion.

In the past, if work wasn't getting done as expected or managers weren't getting the necessary results from their teams, you didn't necessarily have to do the difficult and time-consuming work of examining who was doing what and whether it made sense; you could simply hire more people. In our current climate, cheap capital is no longer available to throw at management difficulties. It's an existential problem for many organizations, and it's breaking down at the role-design level. Hiring a manager, or a CFO, can pass for intentional role design. However, it isn't, and this thinking can lead to hiring failures.

Looking across years of data from working with CEOs and their executive teams, we've noticed two attributes appear in every case of a failed C-suite hire (defined as a hire that exited with less than 18 months of tenure):

Identifying these attributes is one step to finding clarity, but what action does executive leadership need to take to solve a decline in productivity during expansion?

Keep reading about confusion and how Talentism can set up your organization for success.

The Confusion Episode

Start With Me

The 4D Model for Scale

Why Is Everyone Stupid or Lazy?